GNL Adjunctive Therapies Guide, Part 2 of 4

GLP-1RA and GLP-1/GIP in Type 1 Diabetes, the Evidence

Walk through any modern adult diabetes clinic and you will hear the same two questions about adjunct therapy. Does it actually work in T1D, and how solid is the evidence behind that answer? This part walks through the trials that do most of the heavy lifting, light enough to read in one sitting, anchored enough that the next conversation with a specialist team has a footing.

Ask Grace

Want a plain-language walk through a specific trial, side effect or subgroup? Ask Grace.

How the evidence stacks

Park 2024 is the meta-evidence anchor: 24 RCTs across 3,377 adults, pooled into per-mg-dose treatment effects against placebo, and the figure most adult clinics quote when starting the conversation. The trial-by-trial detail (ADJUNCT ONE and TWO, Pasqua 2025, ADJUST-T1D, the tirzepatide observational signal, the paediatric absence) sits inside the disclosures below.

GLP-1 receptor agonist mechanism: five effects relevant to type 1 diabetes A central GLP-1 hub with five spokes radiating to its mechanism effects in the body: gastric emptying delay, satiety in the brain, glucagon suppression in the pancreas alpha cells, beta cell insulin response if any beta function remains, and weight reduction. Each spoke names the relevance for type 1 diabetes specifically. GLP-1RA in T1D, what the molecule actually does Five mechanisms; tirzepatide adds GIP receptor effect on top. GLP-1RA semaglutide, liraglutide SATIETY (brain) Hypothalamic appetite centre, signal “fed”. T1D: weight, BMI lever. GASTRIC EMPTYING (stomach) Slowed; meal arrives to the gut more gently. T1D: shifts pre-bolus window. WEIGHT (whole body) 5 to 12% reduction across the trial spine. T1D: TDD often falls. GLUCAGON (pancreas alpha) Suppressed when glucose is high. T1D: less hepatic glucose. BETA CELL (pancreas) Glucose-dependent insulin secretion if beta function remains. T1D: usually minimal. TIRZEPATIDE adds GIP receptor agonism Stronger weight effect, additional insulin sensitivity benefit; T1D evidence is observational only (Akturk and Shah 2024 epub / 2025 print).
Five mechanisms, all relevant to T1D. The pre-bolus timing window is the one new starts notice first.

The class reliably lowers total daily insulin, improves time in range, produces clinically meaningful weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity, and has a real, non-trivial side-effect profile (gastrointestinal dominant; euglycaemic ketosis worth watching for; hypoglycaemia if insulin is not reduced proactively). Group-average HbA1c effect is modest; CGM-based metrics tell a richer story than HbA1c alone.

The headline trade-off. Grade A evidence in adults supports meaningful TDD reduction, weight loss, and TIR gain in the right candidate; the HbA1c effect is smaller than the CGM picture suggests, and tolerance is the real-world gating issue.

The trial spine

Six studies do most of the work. Tap each for the detail.

ADJUNCT ONE (Mathieu 2016, Diabetes Care)

1,398 adults with T1D, double-blind, treat-to-target, 52 weeks. Liraglutide 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mg daily versus placebo, on top of insulin that could be up-titrated. HbA1c estimated treatment differences versus placebo ran to -0.20 per cent at the 1.8 mg dose; weight changes -4.9, -3.6 and -2.2 kg at the three doses. Symptomatic hypoglycaemia rate ratios 1.17 to 1.31; hyperglycaemia-with-ketosis was 2.22 times more frequent at 1.8 mg than placebo. 22 per cent discontinued for adverse events. The HbA1c effect did not cross the 0.4 per cent regulatory threshold. PMID 27506222. Grade A.

ADJUNCT TWO (Ahrén 2016, Diabetes Care)

835 adults with T1D, 26 weeks, insulin capped at the pre-randomisation dose to isolate the drug effect. Within-arm HbA1c change -0.33, -0.22 and -0.23 per cent at 1.8, 1.2 and 0.6 mg versus +0.01 per cent on placebo. Weight -5.1, -4.0 and -2.5 kg versus -0.2 kg placebo. Hyperglycaemia with ketosis above 1.5 mmol/L at 1.8 mg ran 0.5 versus 0.1 events per patient per year. 16.8 per cent discontinued. PMID 27493132. Grade A.

Note on presentation: ADJUNCT ONE reports between-group treatment differences; ADJUNCT TWO reports within-arm change from baseline. The numbers are not directly comparable. Park 2024 below pools both into per-mg-dose effects.

Pasqua 2025 semaglutide-plus-AID crossover (Nature Medicine)

24 adults with T1D, double-blind randomised crossover. Weekly semaglutide up to 1 mg plus investigational AID versus placebo plus the same AID, around 15 weeks per arm. TIR (3.9 to 10 mmol/L, 70 to 180 mg/dL) rose by approximately 4.8 percentage points versus placebo, with no increase in time below range. HbA1c fell by approximately 0.5 per cent; weight by 5.3 kg; total daily insulin by approximately 11 units per day. No severe hypoglycaemia, no DKA; 2 of 24 completers (8 per cent) developed euglycaemic hyperketonaemia without acidosis. The first RCT of weekly semaglutide combined with AID. PMID 39794615. Grade A.

ADJUST-T1D (Shah 2025, NEJM Evidence)

72 adults with T1D, BMI at least 30, on AID for at least 3 months, HbA1c above 7 per cent. Weekly semaglutide titrated 0.25 to 0.5 to 1 mg versus placebo, 26 weeks, 4 US sites. Primary composite outcome (TIR above 70 per cent AND time below range under 4 per cent AND weight loss at least 5 per cent): 36 per cent semaglutide versus 0 per cent placebo (P below 0.001). HbA1c -0.3 percentage points; TIR +8.8 pp; weight -8.8 kg; total daily insulin -22.3 units per day. Two severe hypoglycaemia episodes in each arm; no DKA; one high-ketone event attributed to an infusion-set failure. 5.5 per cent discontinued for persistent gastrointestinal events. The keystone adult RCT of semaglutide plus AID. PMID 40550013. Grade A.

Tirzepatide observational (Akturk and Shah 2025, JDST)

26 adults with T1D, mean BMI 36.7, single-centre retrospective, weekly tirzepatide titrated 2.5 to 15 mg, 8 months. HbA1c fell by 0.59 per cent at 8 months; weight by 10.1 per cent; TIR rose by 12.6 pp at 3 months and held; TDD fell by 18.9 units per day. No DKA. One severe constipation episode led to discontinuation. One peroneal nerve palsy (foot drop) in association with rapid weight loss. The strongest signal we have for tirzepatide in T1D, but a single-centre N=26 observational cohort cannot be compared head-to-head with the GLP-1RA RCTs. PMID 38317405. Grade C.

Klein and Shah 2025 genetic-obesity substudy (JDST)

26 adults with T1D plus severe early-onset obesity (BMI above 40), retrospective case-control, 6 months. Mutation-positive patients (leptin-melanocortin pathway, Bardet-Biedl variants and others) reached the primary goal in 36.4 per cent versus 80.0 per cent of controls (P=0.04). The continuous outcomes did not reach significance. Exploratory only, but the first human-genetic signal that a meaningful minority of high-BMI T1D patients may have a blunted drug-class response. Grade C.

ADJUNCT post-hoc (Shah 2024, JDST)

Pre-specified completer-versus-non-completer analysis pooled across ADJUNCT ONE and TWO. Non-completers had lower BMI, longer T1D duration, and a higher proportion with undetectable C-peptide. Severe hypoglycaemia and DKA did not drive discontinuation; gastrointestinal and metabolism adverse events did. The clinical takeaway: the low-BMI, long-duration, C-peptide-negative adult is the one most likely to struggle with tolerance, a finding that shapes modern patient selection. PMID 39717993. Grade B.

The Park 2024 meta-analysis, the numerical anchor

Park and colleagues (Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2024) pooled 24 RCTs across 3,377 adults, producing per-mg-dose treatment effects against placebo. Liraglutide 1.8 mg daily: HbA1c -0.28 per cent, weight -4.89 kg, TDD -7.51 units per day. Liraglutide 1.2 mg: HbA1c -0.21 per cent, weight -3.77 kg, TDD -5.28 units per day. Liraglutide 0.6 to 0.9 mg: HbA1c -0.17 per cent, weight -2.27 kg, TDD non-significant. Exenatide: HbA1c -0.17 per cent, weight -4.06 kg, TDD -9.76 units per day.

Park 2024 meta-analysis: pooled GLP-1RA effect sizes in T1D across HbA1c, weight, total daily insulin and severe hypoglycaemia Forest-plot-style horizontal bar chart of pooled treatment effects from the Park 2024 meta-analysis of 24 RCTs and 3,377 adults with type 1 diabetes. HbA1c, body weight and total daily insulin show meaningful liraglutide-dose-dependent reductions; severe hypoglycaemia shows a non-significant odds ratio. Population-average effect sizes; not personalised dosing. Park 2024 meta-analysis, pooled GLP-1RA effect sizes in T1D 24 RCTs, 3,377 adults; per-mg liraglutide effect sizes pooled against placebo at 12 weeks. Population-average; not a personalised dose. no effect HbA1c reduction per cent, vs placebo -0.28 per cent liraglutide 1.8 mg Range across doses: -0.17 to -0.28 per cent Body weight kilograms, vs placebo -4.89 kg liraglutide 1.8 mg Range across doses: -2.27 to -4.89 kg Total daily insulin units per day, vs placebo -7.51 IU per day liraglutide 1.8 mg Liraglutide 0.6 mg dose: non-significant; exenatide pooled: -9.76 IU Severe hypoglycaemia odds ratio vs placebo OR 0.67 95 per cent CI 0.43 to 1.04, not significant Ketosis (any) odds ratio vs placebo OR 1.8 95 per cent CI 1.1 to 2.8, modest signal POPULATION-AVERAGE FINDINGS Per-mg liraglutide effect sizes pooled across 24 RCTs (Park et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024). Individual response varies. Personal dose stays with the diabetes care team.
Pooled liraglutide effect sizes against placebo at 12 weeks. Modest HbA1c, meaningful weight, meaningful TDD reduction; severe hypoglycaemia odds ratio crosses one. Population-average data, not a personalised dose.

The signal is consistent across analyses: modest HbA1c, meaningful weight, meaningful TDD reduction, a clear dose-response from 0.6 to 1.8 mg. Park 2024 sits behind Table 2 of the 2025 DTS consensus and is the figure most adult clinics quote when starting the conversation.

What the international consensus says

Consensus reports translate the evidence into practice; under GNL methodology they sit at Grade C regardless of journal, because consensus is where expert opinion meets the evidence rather than where the evidence lives. Three documents matter most as of 2026, and they agree on more than they disagree.

Diabetes Technology Society Consensus (Shah, Klonoff and colleagues 2025)

19-member panel, 32 proposed recommendations, 31 passed. Adults only; the paediatric gap is flagged explicitly. Recommendation 11 anchors the start-low-go-slow titration; Recommendations 17 to 20 set the patient-selection criteria (overweight, obesity, insulin resistance, postprandial hyperglycaemia not controlled by optimised meal strategy, severe insulin resistance, high CVD or CKD risk). Recommendation 9 reminds us that gastrointestinal side effects can mimic DKA and that ketone monitoring stays standard of care. Recommendation 27 calls for AID systems to accommodate the TDD reduction GLP-1RA drives. PMID 39517127.

ISPAD 2024, Adjunctive Therapies chapter

Paediatric and adolescent scope. Explicit: no Phase 3 RCTs exist for GLP-1RA, tirzepatide or SGLT2i in paediatric T1D. Paediatric GLP-1RA approvals are for obesity or T2D only (liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide from age 10 and above), not for T1D. The chapter language is “could be considered adjunctive therapy in specific populations of children and adolescents with T1D and obesity”, inside an overarching statement that “larger trials are needed”. Part 4 of this guide treats the paediatric question directly. PMID 39884261.

ADA/EASD 2021 and ADA Standards of Care 2025

The ADA/EASD 2021 adult T1D consensus (Holt and colleagues, Diabetologia) is the definitive adult document as of 2026. It acknowledges GLP-1RA may be considered in adults with T1D and obesity, citing observed effects around 0.2 to 0.4 per cent HbA1c reduction, approximately 5 kg weight loss, and reductions in insulin doses. Adults only. The cautious-reduction-at-initiation framework (10 to 20 per cent) is operationalised in the Saeed 2024 Clinical Diabetes companion paper. The ADA Standards of Care 2025 Section 9 aligns with the 2021 framework; adjunct indication remains not approved by the FDA. PMID 34590174 and PMID 39651989.

Important note

This content is for educational exploration only. It summarises published RCT, meta-analysis and consensus evidence and is not medical advice. Decisions to start, adjust or stop GLP-1RA or GLP-1/GIP therapy must be made jointly with a specialist diabetes team. All use in T1D is off-label.

How GNL builds its tools and curates evidence →

Part 2 of 4

GLP-1RA and GLP-1/GIP in T1D, the Evidence

Read more on GNL

Ask Grace